Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:04:44 EST

Previous message: Tex Texin: "Compelling unicode demo, Looking for Mr. Goodname."
In reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Reply: James Kass: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Yes, we'll there's something weird about your pages because I've done
> those things, and I can't even view plane 0 Chinese characters in those
> pages properly, regardless of whether I use the font-specified,
> no-font-specified or weft versions.

You mean Extension A?

There is a known bug in IE of all shipping versions that will not display
Extension A unless you have the specified font (there is no "script range"
to pick that will handle this range, a small oversight on their part).

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/

Previous message: Tex Texin: "Compelling unicode demo, Looking for Mr. Goodname."
In reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Reply: James Kass: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Nov 20 2001 - 15:00:46 EST