Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 12:16:04 EST

Previous message: Tex Texin: "enough for now."
Maybe in reply to: jen w: "Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Could it be that the negative number has come from a misguided attempt
> to treat a unicode code point as a *signed* 16-bit number?
> If so, this would be U+8679 (which is also a valid CJK character).

hung2 "rainbow", by the way, an appropriate character to result
from an overtherainbowflow.

--Ken

Previous message: Tex Texin: "enough for now."
Maybe in reply to: jen w: "Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Nov 21 2001 - 13:11:48 EST