Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 02:31:59 EST

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Reply: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Reply: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:37 PM 11/27/01 -0800, James Kass wrote:
>Isn't that where it belongs? Default display for isolated combining
>marks shows them with the dotted circle.

No it does not. That's an artifact of the Unicode code chart notation.

25CC in many fonts (and in the charts for that matter) looks different
than the dotted circle we are using for the charts.

A./

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
In reply to: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Reply: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Reply: James Kass: "Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 03:35:31 EST