Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation ofhuman sexes"

• Previous message: David Starner: "Re: Are these characters encoded?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

You already have Unicode codes for the representation of human sexes.

Men: U+7537 or U+2642

Women: U+5973 or U+2640

Isn't this enough? ^_^

Oh by the way, I remember a Japanese lady showed me that "kaku" (the counter for strokes of a written character) is... lemme see... U+753B. Unicode 3.0 has it as U+756B.

-- 
_______________________________________________
Get your free email from http://www.ranmamail.com
Powered by Outblaze

• Previous message: David Starner: "Re: Are these characters encoded?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:51:27 EST