Re: Are these characters encoded?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 10:03:19 EST

Previous message: Nesbitt, Gavin: "New Syllabic Unicode Fonts (Inuktitut UCAS range)"
In reply to: Tom Gewecke: "Re: Are these characters encoded?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 07:33 -0700 04/12/2001, Tom Gewecke wrote:

>I believe there is also a (medical) s-overbar abbreviation for "without"
>(latin sin, no doubt) and an ss-overbar abbreviation for "one-half."
>Presumably these are only used in handwriting by specially trained people.

The first would be "sine" 'without'.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: Nesbitt, Gavin: "New Syllabic Unicode Fonts (Inuktitut UCAS range)"
In reply to: Tom Gewecke: "Re: Are these characters encoded?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Dec 04 2001 - 10:02:16 EST