Re: RE: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8

From: Rick McGowan (rick@unicode.org)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 15:01:05 EST

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: GB 18030 question"
Maybe in reply to: Yves Arrouye: "RE: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8"
Next in thread: Mark Davis: "Re: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8"
Next in thread: Dan Kogai: "Re: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Marco wrote...

> The web version of the data seems more up to date than the ftp site.

They are the same files, available through different protocols!

Rick

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: GB 18030 question"
Maybe in reply to: Yves Arrouye: "RE: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8"
Next in thread: Mark Davis: "Re: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8"
Next in thread: Dan Kogai: "Re: ICU's uconv vs Linux iconv and UTF-8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 14:21:15 EST