On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, John Cowan wrote:
> Gaspar Sinai scripsit:
>
> > So it is perfectly ok? I can make a non-ebedded example too.
> > I do not have time to make childish examples and screenshots
> > to get through my point. I have a job to do and text processing
> > is just my hobby.
>
> Mine too, but it's difficult to understand the merits of an
> objection when no actual examples of the problem are given.
So common language is screenshots... Ok. I updated the page.
Now the exact same file is viewed with two different viewers
at the bottom of this page:
http://www.yudit.org/security/
I maintain my view that if there is no proven
reversable logical-to-viewed/viewed-to-logical
electronic signatures should be avoided.
And the bottom line is: I don't really care if
Unicode will admit that this is a problem. If
my reasoning (not my screenshots) convince
*some* people not to sign electronically unicode
text I think I did those guys good - and that
is enough satisfaction for me.
Cheers
gaspar
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 04 2002 - 00:01:32 EST