On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John H. Jenkins wrote:
> Thomas, do you have a reference for U+9EBC (麼) and U+9EBD (麽) being
> different? The only dictionary I have which contains both is the
> (traditional) CiHai, it and it claims they're variants of each other.
Belated, but a little more on these two. "Annex T: Procedure for the
Unification and Arrangement of CJK Ideographs"[1] (AMD8 of ISO/IEC
10646-1:1993) at the very end of section T.3, gives this pair as an
example of unification blocked by source separation (a T source is the
culprit).
[1] ftp://ftp.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/pub/irg/AnnexT.rtf
Thomas Chan
tc31@cornell.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 04 2002 - 12:06:27 EST