Thanks to everyone for researching this question!
Deborah
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Qingjiang (Brian) Yuan wrote:
> Frank and Deborah,
> After I saw the e-mail from Deborah, I asked our Beijing office to
> contact the CESI. The follow is the information we got:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Have contacted with CESI. It is really a glyph bug. They have fixed it,
> but they did not notify us!
>
> CESI will not give us the updated fonts until tomorrow morning. It was
> said that there are serial glyph have been updated in the new version of
> the bitmap fonts.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks.
> Brian.
>
> Yung-Fong Tang Wrote:
>>
>> I looks like both Mac/Linux/Window N6.2 and current Mozilla map that to
>> FFE3. Looks like IE on winXP do the same way.
>>
>> We, mozilla i18n group, got the GB18030 mapping table from sun. B Yuan,
>> any comment?
>>
>> Michael Everson wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:23 -0800 2002-02-01, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is an error on page 10 of the GB 18030-2000 standard, in that
>>>> the character with code point A3FE maps to U+FFE3 (FULLWIDTH MACRON),
>>>> but is shown with a glyph that corresponds to U+FF5E (FULLWIDTH
>>>> TILDE). The position of the character in its code block would also
>>>> seem to indicate that tilde was intended.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any idea of which should be considered correct, the
>>>> glyph or the Unicode mapping value?
>>>
>>>
>>> Glyphs are informative in JTC1. I can only assume that the GB
>>> standards would follow suit.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Feb 05 2002 - 19:16:24 EST