Re: Unicode and Security

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold (elharo@metalab.unc.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 15:45:25 EST


At 12:28 PM -0800 2/7/02, John Hudson wrote:

>1. The software industry has already devised mechanisms to protect
>against e-mail forgery, e.g. private-public key encryption.
>

And nobody uses them because they're too complex.

>2. What you describe is criminal fraud and there are laws to protect
>against such 'spoofing' and to punish those who perpetrate it.
>

Yes, there are. And there are laws to protect against spam and denial
of service attacks and cracking systems. For that matter there are
laws to protect against burglary, but I still have locks on my front
door. Laws are no substitute for prevention.

-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java news: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML news: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 15:42:26 EST