Bernard Miller wrote:
> Instead of
>.proclaiming Unicode is not to blame, it would be a
> good idea for Unicode to provide some character
> properties that could help an implementation reduce
> spoofing.
What criteria would you use for determining these properties? How would
you determine which characters should be identified as "spoof buddies"
(after you've gotten the easy cases like Latin/Greek/Cyrillic A out of
the way)?
If your answer is "by lookin' at 'em," then my next question will be,
"In what font?"
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 02:03:46 EST