Re: UTF-16 is not Unicode

From: David Starner (starner@okstate.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 15:28:13 EST


On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> OK, UTF-8 is my favorite default UTF too. However, whatever the default is,
> it is easier to just call it "Unicode", and call the other options "Unicode
> (something else)".
>
> That puts one less acronym in front of the "naive" user. The expert user is
> supposed to know what the default UTF is on her platform.

What happens when a user is told to save in UTF-16? What about when two
users running different operating systems try to pass files about? And
why would Unicode be any clearer to a naive user than UTF-16?

IMO, UTF-16 is as clear as Unicode, and more accurate. Being consistent
among platforms is a needed plus.

-- 
David Starner / Давид Старнзр - starner@okstate.edu
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
What we've got is a blue-light special on truth. It's the hottest thing 
with the youth. -- Information Society, "Peace and Love, Inc."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 15:19:07 EST