Re: This spoofing and security thread

From: David Starner (starner@okstate.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 14 2002 - 13:01:02 EST

Previous message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "FW: This spoofing and security thread"
In reply to: Yves Arrouye: "RE: This spoofing and security thread"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: This spoofing and security thread"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:25:07PM -0800, Yves Arrouye wrote:
> Well, wouldn't you expect an American standard to properly encode the
> important characters for English? I would.

I'm simply arguing that, for English at least, the list of characters
that are needed can be easily codified and has been listed. Other
languages will of course need different lists, but the same is likely
true for them.

-- 
David Starner / Давид Старнэр - starner@okstate.edu
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
What we've got is a blue-light special on truth. It's the hottest thing 
with the youth. -- Information Society, "Peace and Love, Inc."

Previous message: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "FW: This spoofing and security thread"
In reply to: Yves Arrouye: "RE: This spoofing and security thread"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: This spoofing and security thread"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Feb 14 2002 - 12:26:45 EST