Could I ask that discussion on language names be confined just to the
lists _other_than_ <unicode@unicode.org>, to avoid multiple postings?
Examples are recent postings on names of various Sami (or Saami)
languages.
It is already widely discussed on <iso639@dkuug.dk>,
<langtag@unicode.org>, <ietf-languages@iana.org>.
Adding <unicode@unicode.org>, (and also <unicore@unicode.org>) seems
merely superfluous.
I imagine that I'm not the only one to get fed up with multiple
postings.
Best regards
John Clews
-- John Clews, Keytempo Limited (Information Management), 8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG Email: Scripts@sesame.demon.co.uk tel: +44 1423 888 432;Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization; Committee Member of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1: Language Codes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Feb 19 2002 - 09:22:10 EST