RE: CRLF vs. LF (was Re: Unicode and end users)

From: Chris Pratley (chrispr@microsoft.com)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 17:54:17 EST


A correction on Murray's comment: Note that Word2002 handles all of
these types of line breaks (CRLF, LF, CR, and PS) and roundtrips them so
that your LF-only text file remains LF after editing.

I have to agree that Word is not in the class of "system default
editors"

Chris
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word

Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Scherer [mailto:markus.scherer@jtcsv.com]
Sent: February 21, 2002 2:29 PM
To: unicode list
Subject: Re: CRLF vs. LF (was Re: Unicode and end users)

Murray Sargent wrote:

> be fairly easy to have an option to write LF files, if there's
> sufficient interest.

I think there is no doubt very high interest in editors - especially
system default editors like notepad - that can both
- read plain text using any style line breaks (see Unicode TR)
- write plain text at least in LF or CRLF if not all the others too
   (CR, NL, LS, PS)

markus



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Feb 21 2002 - 17:25:19 EST