Re: Standard Conventions and euro

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 17:30:29 EST

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: U+015F (ş) vs. U+0219 (ș)"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Standard Conventions and euro"
Next in thread: Tex Texin: "Re: Standard Conventions and euro"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Standard Conventions and euro"
Reply: Tex Texin: "Re: Standard Conventions and euro"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Marco Cimarosti wrote:

> Rather, this format was required by some USA retailers, who wanted two and a
> half dollar to be formatted as:
>
> 2$50

I think that is Brazilian cruzeiros, but definitely not USD which are
always written $2.50.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: U+015F (ş) vs. U+0219 (ș)"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Standard Conventions and euro"
Next in thread: Tex Texin: "Re: Standard Conventions and euro"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Standard Conventions and euro"
Reply: Tex Texin: "Re: Standard Conventions and euro"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 22 2002 - 17:02:25 EST