Re: Unicode Myths

• Previous message: Misha.Wolf@reuters.com: "21st Unicode Conference, May 2002, Dublin, Ireland -- Four weeks to go!"
• In reply to: Rick Cameron: "RE: Unicode Myths"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

That's what I get for typing quickly. Should be:

The surrogate and noncharacter code points are permanently reserved,
and can't ever--now or in the future--have *characters* assigned to
them, whereas the unassigned can have *characters* assigned to them in
the future.
—————

Γνῶθι σαυτόν — Θαλῆς
[For transliteration, see http://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/tr]

http://www.macchiato.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Cameron" <Rick.Cameron@crystaldecisions.com>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:02
Subject: RE: Unicode Myths

> Mark Davis wrote:
>
> > The surrogate and noncharacter code points are permanently
reserved, and
> can't ever--now or in the future--have code
> > points assigned to them, whereas the unassigned can have code
points
> assigned to them in the future.
>
> Huh? The code points can't have code points assigned to them?
>
> Do you want to rephrase that? It's a good example of how hard it is
to keep
> the terminology straight!
>
> Thanks
>
> - rick cameron
>
>
>

• Previous message: Misha.Wolf@reuters.com: "21st Unicode Conference, May 2002, Dublin, Ireland -- Four weeks to go!"
• In reply to: Rick Cameron: "RE: Unicode Myths"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Apr 12 2002 - 14:39:05 EDT