Re: Private Use proposals

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu May 23 2002 - 12:20:27 EDT

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Changes to ISO 3166-1 and ISO 3166-2"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Private Use proposals"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Private Use proposals (long)"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Private Use proposals (long)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 08:51 -0700 2002-05-21, Doug Ewell wrote:
>(Deseret and Shavian were encoded in ConScript; whether that helped
>get them into Unicode or not, I don't know.)

Certainly not. They were examimed on their merits just like anything else.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Changes to ISO 3166-1 and ISO 3166-2"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Private Use proposals"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Private Use proposals (long)"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Private Use proposals (long)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu May 23 2002 - 10:33:28 EDT