Re: Hexadecimal characters.

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 18:07:00 EDT

Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
In reply to: Tom Finch: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Tom Finch scripsit:

> Hmm, so representing Devanagari digits is more important than
> hexadecimal, which is used almost more than decimal on the web? I know
> inertia is a law of the universe, but this is rediculous. Hexadecimal is
> very important and deserves to be in Plane 0. I see a good spot in misc
> technical (23D--oh look hexadecimal again).

Clueless still, I see. (Yes, that's ad hominem.)

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
In reply to: Tom Finch: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Hexadecimal characters."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 16:29:13 EDT