On 06/28/2002 11:34:35 PM "Doug Ewell" wrote:
><sigh /> OK, here are the details...
OK, now I know the cha$B?(B of events that he was referr$B?(Bg to, and I'm def$B?(B
itely $B?(Bcl$B?(Bed to agree that it was a complete co$B?(Bcidence. It is trivial, $B?(B
fact, to disprove the hypothesis that the "experiment" supposedly proved.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jun 29 2002 - 15:15:10 EDT