[I see the encoding in my response got botched -- trying again.]
On 06/29/2002 08:34:44 PM "John H. Jenkins" wrote:
>> OK, now I know the cha of events that he was referrg to, and I'm def
>> itely cled to agree that it was complete cocidence. It is trivial,
>> fact, to disprove the hypothesis that the "experiment" supposedly
proved.
>>
>>
>
>Will you guys *please* stop sending me email with the Shavian letter
>CHURCH everywhere the Latin letters "ct" should be? It's most
distracting.
> :-)
John, please don't assume that I use private-use codepoints the same way
someone else does without first verifying. My document contained neither a
Latin ligature "ct" not Shavian letter CHURCH, but rather my most
delightful LATIN LIGATURE IN WITH SWASH SERIF AND TAIL.
;-)
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Jul 01 2002 - 07:28:15 EDT