Re: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 13:52:09 EDT

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures"
In reply to: B $B$m!;!;!;: "Re: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ"
Next in thread: Wm Se獺n Glen: "Re: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:38 -0400 2002-07-02, ヒ驀驀驀驀ヒ驀驀驀 wrote:
>I have a few ideas:
>
>Fictional scripts that would probably be rejected, such as the
>script of the Codex Seraphinianus

Certainly not. Tengwar and Cirth are certain to be encoded. The
Codex script would probably not be encoded because it occurs in only
one manuscript and is undeciphered.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: ZWJ and Latin Ligatures"
In reply to: B $B$m!;!;!;: "Re: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ"
Next in thread: Wm Se獺n Glen: "Re: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 12:07:23 EDT