William Overington had written:
> the proposal for encoding of the Phaistos Disk Script into Unicode
> [...] was rejected. Is this really for a purported reason that the
> script is only found on one item at present?
Michael Everson wrote:
> That, and the fact that it hasn't been deciphered.
Which implies that you really cannot tell what constitutes a character,
in that script, nor its writing-direction.
William Overington had written:
> I noticed in particular that the characters are non-contiguous within
> themselves.
This is not enough to decide what constitutes a character. E. g. the
cyrillic character "Ы" is non-contiguous; in the Latin script, when
"f" and "l" are ligated, they still constitute two characters.
Best wishes,
Otto Stolz
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Jul 04 2002 - 09:34:39 EDT