Re: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Jul 05 2002 - 06:25:55 EDT

Previous message: Michael Jansson: "RE: Can browsers show text? I don't think so"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 21:52 -0400 2002-07-04, John Cowan wrote:
>The Unicode Standard (version 3.0, chapter 7) claims that Ogham and
>Runic were still in non-revivalist use to the 16th and 19th centuries
>respectively. Does anyone know where the evidence for these statements
>was found?

I do.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: Michael Jansson: "RE: Can browsers show text? I don't think so"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
Next in thread: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 04:54:07 EDT