RE: The pointless thread continues

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Jul 05 2002 - 17:19:21 EDT

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: [unicode] Re: FW: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Next in thread: Apurva Joshi: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: unicode Digest V2 #167"
Reply: John Hudson: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The only solution I see is that whatever data exists in ASCII hacks
or other web font solutions has to one day be mapped and converted to
proper Unicode sequences, if the data is to be saved. How much
discussion does this need?

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: [unicode] Re: FW: Inappropriate Proposals FAQ"
In reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Next in thread: Apurva Joshi: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: unicode Digest V2 #167"
Reply: John Hudson: "RE: The pointless thread continues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 15:30:31 EDT