>everyone is much too busy discussing implementation of scripts in 
>the ConScript registry which they admit will probably never be 
>encoded
I think the Phaistos discussion has been interesting and perhaps 
instructive to some of the lurkers, because we've discussed the issue 
fairly openly using some of the criteria to accept or reject 
characters, name them, and opened a whole can of worms regarding 
ancient script attestation, directionality, and modern font use. 
These are interesting questions, and it is interesting to discuss 
them. And it is potentially useful to MY work, which, as you know, is 
to fill up Unicode with all kinds of wonderful alphabets and scripts 
which the larger corporations may not take an interest in, but a 
whole lot of regular folk do indeed.
Perhaps, pointless as you may think it, it hasn't been pointless at 
all. I made a Unicode font using PUA code positions and it was tested 
in a number of browsers on a number of different platforms. Having 
made that font, and having it work, was a step forward. And putting 
Phaistos in the CSUR was a kindness to people who do take an interest 
in the script, and there are an awful lot of pages out there which do.
>getting remedial CSS lessons
Sorry I'm not a clever programmer like you are, MichKa, but you could 
be a little less snotty. :-) In point of fact, I hadn't bothered to 
mark the font in my first draft of the Phaistos text, and OmniWeb 
under OS X read it anyway because the two are clever about knowing 
what characters are in the fonts available. Other browsers and OSes 
aren't as smart, so I added the font tag. That's not recommended, but 
CSS is, and frankly I find the CSS specification rather bizarre and 
certainly not user-friendly, which is why I have not studied it 
assiduously. I have had other things to do, like reading N'Ko and New 
Tai Lue dictionaries looking for ordering data.
It's summer. We're indulging ourselves a little, but it's not as 
pointless as you would have it, and you could be a bit more patient 
with us. We're just as serious about Unicode as you are.
-- Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 09 2002 - 09:22:08 EDT