Status update re. Inappropriate Proposals FAQ

• Previous message: Tex Texin: "re smelly fonts (was: Saying characters out loud (derives from hash, pound,octothor pe?))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I'm nearly done playing catchup after vacation and hope to begin
extracting concepts for the FAQ next week.

Thanks to all who've submitted input, as conflicting and varied as it
is/was.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asmusf@ix.netcom.com [mailto:asmusf@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:53
>
>
> I would like to once again suggest that we refocus this 'FAQ'
>
> AWAY from a repetition of the "Principles and Procedures"
> document maintained
> by WG2 and containing the explanation of what constitutes a
> valid *formal*
> proposal.
 

• Previous message: Tex Texin: "re smelly fonts (was: Saying characters out loud (derives from hash, pound,octothor pe?))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 12 2002 - 17:24:26 EDT