Re: The standard disclaimer

From: James Kass (jameskass@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 10:12:52 EDT

Previous message: Roozbeh Pournader: "Re: Dublin Conference: Re: ISO/IEC 10646 versus Unicode"
In reply to: John Cowan: "The standard disclaimer"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: The standard disclaimer"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: The standard disclaimer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Cowan wrote,

> .... However, just as
> no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding)

What about Gummo? (Or,... Karl? or... Deutsche ?)

Best regards,

James Kass.

Previous message: Roozbeh Pournader: "Re: Dublin Conference: Re: ISO/IEC 10646 versus Unicode"
In reply to: John Cowan: "The standard disclaimer"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: The standard disclaimer"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: The standard disclaimer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 24 2002 - 08:08:32 EDT