-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Doug Ewell wrote:
> Addison Phillips [wM] <aphillips at webmethods dot com> wrote:
> > Well, I'm pretty sure Hawaiian isn't going to get [a 2-letter code],
> > because it doesn't meet the requirements for ISO 639-1.
>
> The requirement that it doesn't meet is that it already has a 3-letter
> code (haw). BTW, note that RFC 3066, in citing Hawaiian as an example
> of this requirement, misstates the code for Hawaiian as "hwi".
I've submitted this as an erratum to the RFC editor (see
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html>).
- --
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>
Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBPUb13jkCAxeYt5gVAQFwpggAyY8ockLpXv0+x1MAa7TtdEC57HyyvS7S
4Kmg4zVKm6KgKBO+cxl5Q2uh2jQYjomtX8ip7DfilEoUeMhRyhw4luMrhrOvQ9cT
57OkCoJXwTE78K9qEQRNGHaPT+Ue6Bou+rb6Xu47N2b1wQ8eGX4x8KmylF4eNwAD
yNee2w0M0Tb8+w1nMVVmwrZ6IKYYr+Am7Gh1MaWmitCGKPi0Erj8WA/rfKvpM0LJ
zUyUjrBddHz02FwKBxiDbZwXIwhG2MqP83jQ4snfXwjxBjVl0+lscAZmhqmE/rLu
CtiMJv8ol8wAgLlr94RzrWdaHkzJc0RiwyhHbegnW4O6zt6DR3RW8A==
=iJT9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 13:29:24 EDT