James Kass wrote:
> Is this a graphic showing the experimental diacritics you mention?
> http://www.geocities.com/avarangal/imagay1.gif
> 
> If so, it should be possible for most of these to be encoded in text
> as pronunciation indicators using existing Unicode characters.
> 
> Glyph  -  Unicode
>  No.         Poss.
> --------------------
> [...]
> 0096  U+E6FD **
> [...]
> 
> ** The stroke in Phaistos symbols in ConScript PUA encoding is
>      the closest I could find.
:-)))
C'mon, be serious! That can be mapped to U+0316 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT
BELOW).
_ Marco
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 31 2002 - 10:03:22 EDT