From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Fri Sep 20 2002 - 18:44:57 EDT
On 09/20/2002 04:44:46 PM Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>This stuff *can* all be handled with appropriately designed
>ligations in fonts, so there are options for display:
>
><U+0074, U+0361, U+0073, U+0307>
>
> ==>
> maps via ligation table to:
>
>{t-s-tie-ligature-with-dot-above} glyph
I would consider this an anomolous rendering. It is counter-exemplified by
figure 7-6 in TUS3.0. I'd be concerned of longer-term problems if we
decided to say that this was a valid alternate rendering from
>{t-s-dot-tie-ligature} glyph
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 20 2002 - 19:41:59 EDT