From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 15:59:41 EST
On 2002.10.28, 13:09, David Starner <starner@okstate.edu> wrote:
> Basically, any decorative or handwriting font can't be a Unicode font.
<...>
> Seems pointless to tell a lot of the fontmakers out there that they
> shouldn't worry about Unicode, because Unicode's only for standard
> book fonts
Hm, what if I want to make, say, snow capped Devanagari glyphs for my
hiking company in Nepal? Shouldn't I assign them to Unicode code points?
-- ____.
António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt> |####|
R. Laureano de Oliveira, 64 r/c esq. |
PT-1885-050 MOSCAVIDE (LRS) Não me invejo de quem tem |
+351 917 511 549 carros, parelhas e montes |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 28 2002 - 17:08:47 EST