From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Thu Dec 26 2002 - 16:12:49 EST
On 2002.12.24, 20:01, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> This situation is exacerbated by the fact that Latin and Cyrillic Q
> and W do not look noticably different, if at all, which means that the
> even the (inadvertant) future use of Latin Q and W cannot be ruled
> out, perpetuating the incidences of dual encoding.
Devil's advocate would point out that one can say the very same thing
about A, B, C and many such pairs of cyrillic-latin equivalents (some of
them false ones, granted).
FWIW, I have experienced many cases (esp. in e-mail) of this, especially
with swapped U+0441 and U+0063, which are placed on the same key in most
cyrillic keyboards.
-- ____.
António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt> |####|
R. Laureano de Oliveira, 64 r/c esq. |
PT-1885-050 MOSCAVIDE (LRS) Não me invejo de quem tem |
+351 917 511 549 carros, parelhas e montes |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 26 2002 - 17:57:32 EST