Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jan 01 2003 - 14:14:14 EST

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I want to use friendly names for development, but I don't mind using
uniXXXX names for the release versions. But I would like standard
tools to translate between, and that means there should be a
more-or-less standard list of friendly names.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 14:40:20 EST