Re: A case for Tamil-X (k sh)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 07:06:35 EST

Next message: Andrew C. West: "Fwd: Re: PRC asking for 956 precomposed Tibetan characters"

Previous message: Andrew C. West: "Re: PRC asking for 956 precomposed Tibetan characters"
In reply to: Avarangal: "A case for Tamil-X (k sh)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: A case for Tamil-X (k sh)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Avarangal,

You need to produce a proposal document showing the problem, with its
glyphs, and filling out the proposal summary form for the character
you want to add. Otherwise nothing will happen.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Andrew C. West: "Fwd: Re: PRC asking for 956 precomposed Tibetan characters"
Previous message: Andrew C. West: "Re: PRC asking for 956 precomposed Tibetan characters"
In reply to: Avarangal: "A case for Tamil-X (k sh)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: A case for Tamil-X (k sh)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 06 2003 - 07:43:16 EST