From: Andrew C. West (andrewcwest@alumni.princeton.edu)
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 04:39:38 EST
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:29:29 -0800 (PST), "Doug Ewell" wrote:
> Indeed, the TLG proposal for numerals [1]
> does include a GREEK HALF SIGN, although their preferred glyph does not
> include the "prime" sign Raymond mentioned (it is listed as a glyph
> variant, however).
Yet Footnote 1 in this document does use a "prime" sign in all its examples of
the usage of the 1/2 and 2/3 glyphs. Does this mean perhaps that the unadorned
(prime-less) 1/2 and 2/3 characters need to be used in conjunction with a
"prime" sign (U+????) to represent 1/2 and 2/3 ?
Andrew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 22 2003 - 05:29:21 EST