From: jcowan@reutershealth.com
Date: Sun Feb 02 2003 - 11:55:41 EST
Asmus Freytag scripsit:
> However, there are some unidentified characters, or ones that could be
> considered missing from Unicode 4.0, or which have mappings that for one
> or the other reason could be considered not ideal. These have been
> highlighted. I welcome suggestions for additions to or subtractions from
> this list, plus any help anyone could provide in identifying the characters
> or in locating places they are used.
I strongly suspect that your various DIGRAPHS WITH BREVE BELOW are
actually underties. In addition, U+F7A1 looks like a glyph variant
of the glyph often used in American dictionaries to represent edh,
though I have more often seen it with the stroke passing through both
legs of the "h" portion. U+F776 and U+F777 are probably also American
dictionary characters representing the so-called "short" and "long"
sounds of English "oo", though I have more often seen them without ligaturing.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 12:22:59 EST