Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 15:55:57 EST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: compatibility between unicode 2.0 and 3.0"

Previous message: Deborah Goldsmith: "Re: How is glyph shaping done?"
Maybe in reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?"
Next in thread: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

F7C7: A palatalised y is pretty unlikely (it's already palatal). Sure it's
not a palatalised v?

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: compatibility between unicode 2.0 and 3.0"
Previous message: Deborah Goldsmith: "Re: How is glyph shaping done?"
Maybe in reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?"
Next in thread: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 03 2003 - 16:43:21 EST