From: Tex Texin (tex@i18nguy.com)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 14:46:48 EST
Guys,
fair enough. I thought the semi-serious name would have been indication enough
for someone to hit the delete key and remove the name, but I guess not.
I'll probably hear from a Mr. Max Delete from the Exchange next wanting to
know why I instigated this.
Reminds me of the story of the support call for the instructions that said
"insert disk1. insert disk2 when prompted. insert disk 3 when prompted."
and the caller only inserted and never removed the previous disks...
;-)
I should have stopped at "There probably isn't a one-size fits all solution".
tex
Curtis Clark wrote:
>
> Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> > * Tex Texin
> > |
> > | There probably isn't a one-size fits all solution, short of those
> > | not wanting a response changing their reply-to address to
> > | "delete@me.org".
> >
> > That's dangerous. Quite a few email clients will then create replies
> > that go only to that address, so nobody will see them at all...
> >
>
> Actually, no, the postmaster of the Montréal Stock Exchange (me.org) is
> likely to see every one of them.
>
> The only domain name that is reserved is example.com/org/whatever. Every
> other domain is potentially in use.
>
> --
> Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
> Mockingbird Font Works http://www.mockfont.com/
-- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com Making e-Business Work Around the World -------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 15:35:55 EST