Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?

From: Tom Gewecke (tom@bluesky.org)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 08:59:11 EST

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: traditional vs simplified chinese"

Previous message: William Overington: "Re: Plane 14 Tag Deprecation Issue (was Re: VS vs. P14 (was Re: IndicDevanagari Query))"
In reply to: Jungshik Shin: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Next in thread: Markus Scherer: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Reply: Markus Scherer: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Aside from Tex Texin's experimental pages, does any one have url's of web
sites done in UTF-16 rather than UTF-8? I don't, but would not mind having
some examples for testing.

Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: traditional vs simplified chinese"
Previous message: William Overington: "Re: Plane 14 Tag Deprecation Issue (was Re: VS vs. P14 (was Re: IndicDevanagari Query))"
In reply to: Jungshik Shin: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Next in thread: Markus Scherer: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Reply: Markus Scherer: "Re: newbie: unicode (when used as a coding) = UTF16LE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 09:42:40 EST