From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 10:15:20 EST
Doug Ewell wrote:
>As Stefan Persson already observed, U+212B ANGSTROM SIGN (â„«) exists in
>Unicode alongside U+00C5 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE (Ã…) only
>because both characters were present in some legacy character set with
>which Unicode had to maintain round-trip compatibility.
>
>
Does anyone know which legacy character set we're talking about? I can
only think of character sets including one of them.
Stefan
_____________________________________________________
Gratis e-mail resten av livet på www.yahoo.se/mail
Busenkelt!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 11:08:29 EST