Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 21:45:31 EST

Next message: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"

Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
In reply to: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Next in thread: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Reply: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:08 AM 2/21/03 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Virtually all fonts I know of use the pre-3.0 glyph representations.
> > Sigh. Any suggestion how to fix this mess? [...]

To give just one very widely available example Times New Roman has always
used the post 3.0 glyph.

A./

Next message: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
In reply to: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Next in thread: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Reply: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 20 2003 - 22:11:54 EST