Re: UTF-8 Editors? (Was XML and tags)

From: Mike FABIAN (mfabian@suse.de)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:00:21 EST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: guarani sign"

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
In reply to: Edward H Trager: "Re: UTF-8 Editors? (Was XML and tags)"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 Editors? (Was XML and tags)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Edward H Trager <ehtrager@umich.edu> さんは書きました:

> It turns out that the version of vim that I have does indeed work under
> xterm for an assortment of LTR languages (Indian languages not tested),
> but not Arabic (the only RTL language tested) --I must have had LC_TYPE
> incorrectly set previously. But vim still misbehaves under mlterm -- I
> wonder what's so different about mlterm compared to xterm (especially
> since mlterm appears to handle RTL Arabic correctly?

Works fine for me in mlterm. Maybe your font settings in mlterm are
not suitable?

-- 
Mike Fabian   <mfabian@suse.de>   http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: guarani sign"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
In reply to: Edward H Trager: "Re: UTF-8 Editors? (Was XML and tags)"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: UTF-8 Editors? (Was XML and tags)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:58:56 EST