Re: please review the paper for me

From: Yung-Fong Tang (ftang@netscape.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 18:43:39 EST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: please review the paper for me"

Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: please review the paper for me"
Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: please review the paper for me"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I think that is a very commn mistake people WILL make.

Doug Ewell wrote:

>Thanks to all who pointed out that noncharacters, unlike surrogate code
>points, are NOT illegal or invalid in UTF-8 or any other CES. I don't
>know why I said they were. (Bad brain! Bad, bad brain!)
>
>-Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
>
>
>
>

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: please review the paper for me"
Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: please review the paper for me"
Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: please review the paper for me"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 26 2003 - 19:30:22 EST