RFC2279bis (was RE: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review)

• Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

ftang@netscape.com wrote:
> 1. the definitation in Unicode itself (3.0, 3.1)
> 2. the RFC which summarize it.
>
> I am sure you can control the point 1. But we have to understand the
> point 2 is also important. The reasone people refer to point 2 is
> usually the RFC is much shorter and focus than the Unicode standard
> itself. And also RFC is FREE of charge but not Unicode
> standard itself.

Consequently, it would be nice if anyone with an interest in the matter
would carefully review the internet-draft that is meant to replace RFC 2279
very soon:

 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-04.txt

The proper list for discussing this draft is ietf-charsets@w3.org, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ for archives and subscription info.

-- 
François

• Next message: Yung-Fong Tang: "quoted-string in for MIME Content-Type charset parameter"
• Previous message: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 27 2003 - 17:10:36 EST