From: Pim Blokland (pblokland@planet.nl)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 13:08:58 EDT
António Martins-Tuválkin schreef:
> I'm referencing to a book entitled:
> Памятники
(etc, which translates into Памятники Музея Ізящныхъ Іскусствъ імені
ІмператораАлександра III въ Москве)
> I see that the the roman ordinal "third" can be encoded in a
couple of different ways:
>
> - U+0049 U+0049 U+0049
> - U+0406 U+0406 U+0406 (considering that this old russian
orthography)
> - U+2162
> - U+2160 U+2160 U+2160
No. Encoded like that it may *look* like a roman three, but two of
those are definitely not correct. Only U+2162 or its compatibility
decomposition, U+0049 U+0049 U+0049 should be used. The other two
are bad coding, just as using greek Iotas or combinations of U+2160
and U+0049 would be.
Pim Blokland
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 12 2003 - 14:11:05 EDT