From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 12:11:39 EDT
At 08:44 -0700 2003-06-25, Doug Ewell wrote:
>If it's true that either the UTC or WG2 has formally approved the
>character, for a future version of Unicode or a future amendment to
>10646, then I don't see any reason why font makers can't PRODUCE a font
>with a glyph for the proposed character at the proposed code point.
>
>They just can't DISTRIBUTE the font until the appropriate standard is
>released.
That's correct.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 13:01:02 EDT