Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 11:58:40 EDT

Next message: Youtie Effaight: "Re: Revised N2586R"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Next in thread: Peter Lofting: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 08:11 -0700 2003-06-25, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote:

>Do you (or does anyone) have an actual example where this is the case? It
>may well be true but until someone has a proof there is not really an
>indication of a specific problem for the UTC to address.

A document showing what happens in Case A and what happens in Case B
with actual glyphs would be helpful.

>The current discussion is like arguing about a color that none of the
>participants have ever seen.

Indeed.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Youtie Effaight: "Re: Revised N2586R"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Next in thread: Peter Lofting: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 13:05:14 EDT