Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 13:50:55 EDT

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 18:26 +0100 2003-06-25, Michael Everson wrote:

>You'd like to think so. But "Deprecate TIBETAN THINGY and add
>TIBETAN THINGY BIS so that we can fix the problem" is utterly
>ridiculous.

And by that I mean, given the TWO standards Unicode and ISO/IEC
10646, adding duplicate characters is frowned upon, so it should be
less preferable than UTC fixing broken classes if they really are
broken.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 14:54:42 EDT