RE: Question about Unicode Ranges in TrueType fonts

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 05:22:26 EDT

Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)"

Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Biblical Hebrew"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Question about Unicode Ranges in TrueType fonts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> but premature standardization can
> also be a problem if the wrong choices get codified too soon.

As in canonical combining classes? :-)

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485

Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Biblical Hebrew (Was: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels)"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Biblical Hebrew"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Question about Unicode Ranges in TrueType fonts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 27 2003 - 06:07:35 EDT